Ravon P3 or Lada Granta: which is better, comparison, reviews, pros and cons

Granta and Nexia have been leaders in the budget sedan market for many years. These cars have always attracted the attention of many car owners due to their low cost of purchase and maintenance, simplicity of design and unpretentiousness. But what is better – Ravon P3 (a new name for the good old Daewoo Nexia) or Lada Granta?

Lada Granta 2020

Not long ago, a Russian car was restyled, receiving a more interesting appearance, as well as improving its technical equipment. At the same time, it still remained one of the cheapest on the domestic market. And the Uzbek sedan, which, having been slightly updated, began to be produced under a different brand, returned to our country again after a short absence. But will it attract the attention of Russian buyers?

Comparison of technical characteristics

To understand the main differences between cars, it is worth comparing the Ravon R3 or the Lada Granta. The dimensions of the sedans are quite similar and have only minor differences. The length/width/height of the Ravon R3 is 4330/1690/1505 mm, and the same parameters for the Lada Granta are 4268/1700/1500 mm. Thus, the sedan from Uzbekistan is slightly longer than the Russian one. But the domestic car surpasses it in width and height. True, this difference is almost invisible to the eye and imperceptible when driving. The ground clearance of the cars is the same and is 160 mm. This is quite enough to overcome minor bumps. But such cars are not intended for off-road driving.

For their class, the cars have all the necessary set of functions responsible for safety and comfort. Of course, it is impossible to find the most complex and advanced systems here, but what is available is quite enough. Even the most inexpensive sedans are equipped quite well. At the same time, all equipment is perfectly configured and works at the proper level.

Internal equipment

When you get into the car, you feel a certain “Uzbek flavor”. First of all, this is felt in the peculiarities of the internal filling. The manufacturer has equipped the car with many interesting options. You can't call it empty. The list of standard equipment includes:

ABS;
driver's airbag;
stabilization system (ESC) and others.

It may seem surprising, but with such rich equipment as for a budget brand, the car does not have air conditioning. However, the second trim level (Optimum) is already equipped with air conditioning, as well as many other additional functions. True, it costs a little more. What is missing in the initial configuration is lateral support in the seats.

Engines and transmission

In 2022, the Ravon R3 will be sold on the Russian market with only one type of gasoline engine. It has a volume of 1.5 liters and a power of 107 horsepower. Lada Granta, unlike its rival, can offer customers a noticeably larger selection of engines that also run on gasoline:

1.6 liters of volume with a power of 87 horsepower;
volume 1.6 liters and power 98 “horses”;
with a volume of 1.6 liters and a power of 106 hp.

The power units of sedans are reliable and, with proper maintenance, can operate for a very long time without problems. They are distinguished by very low fuel consumption for such cars and relative unpretentiousness to its quality.

Both cars can be purchased with either a manual or automatic transmission. But the Russian car also has versions with a robot. In the Uzbek sedan, these units operate quite stably and without complaints. And many owners of domestic cars previously complained about frequent breakdowns of the robotic transmission. According to the manufacturer, this problem has now been resolved. But whether this is so is still unknown. But they started installing automatic weapons on the Grant only recently. Therefore, it is too early to talk about its reliability.

Sedans are front-wheel drive cars.

Repair of both models

The differences in warranty and service periods for cars were mentioned above.

As for the availability of products needed by motorists in auto parts stores, the advantage undoubtedly lies on the side of Lada Granta. Spare parts that are suitable for domestically produced cars are easy to find. The necessary components will be available if we are talking about Lada. But spare parts for Nexia will have to wait several days or weeks.

The good build quality of the Lada Granta still leaves room for improvement of the car. This fact also characterizes young Nexias. Significant differences between the models in this sense are difficult to detect. It can be noted that over time, Lada is undergoing changes for the better.

Some will give preference to maneuverability, while reducing the level of safety, in the case of Nexia. Someone, having chosen a domestic car, will opt for a slightly more conservative, but reliable and comfortable ride. Someone will make a decision only by comparing both models. Good luck!

A client can spend hours studying the price lists of automakers, but he will buy exactly the model for which he has enough money... This is the reality. Our country is still far from an ideal automobile world, where in any family each of its members has a personal car. For many Russians, own transport is a luxury, which is why motorists are looking for budget options. But is it possible to buy an inexpensive and at the same time good car? In principle, the “economy” niche is represented quite well and there is something to discuss. Here, for example, are two running models LADA Granta and Daewoo Nexia. You can safely consider these cars, they are in demand. But which model is of better quality - Granta or Nexia? Let's compare.

LADA Granta and Daewoo Nexia are budget cars that are popular on the Russian market

Ride quality, maneuverability and handling

The cars have excellent handling for their class, which is ensured by thoughtful suspension settings and responsive steering. Of course, there are few electronic assistants in them, but this is quite enough for confident driving in any road conditions.

The cars are great for driving around the city and on the highway. Thanks to their small dimensions, they are convenient to park even in limited spaces. And if you have electronic assistants, which are included in expensive versions or can be installed yourself, parking will become extremely simple.

The Ravon's power is quite enough for confident movement on the highway. Its dynamics will appeal even to fans of fast driving. True, this will require a version with a manual transmission. But those who prefer Grant and love speed should buy cars only with a manual transmission and the most powerful engine. The remaining car options are designed for cautious and calm drivers. But a sedan with a manual transmission sometimes shows real miracles of dynamics on the track, which are usually expected from cars of a higher level.

The cars cannot be called ideal for long-distance travel, since the rear passengers in them will be a bit cramped (especially in a Russian sedan). And there is little comfort in them. But they are perfect for traveling on bad roads, as they have sufficient cross-country ability for their class and a relatively reliable and inexpensive suspension to maintain.

Behind the wheel

Landing in Ravon is convenient. It's comfortable to be in the driver's seat. All buttons are located so that they are convenient to use. An old-fashioned 2-din radio tape recorder produces good sound for this class. You can connect to your phone via Bluetooth.

Driving the car is quite convenient. The automatic shifts are fast and logical. Handling is quite adequate for a car of this class. When driving at high speed, there is sometimes a lack of feedback.

Driving in the city is a pleasure. A significant drawback is the stiff suspension. This car model is designed primarily for city driving. On a bad road, the Nexia shakes very much. Another drawback is the low quality of sound insulation in the car.

As for Lada, she behaves completely differently on the road than Ravon. The ergonomics of the Granta's driver's seat are quite normal, but there is no height adjustment.

Comparison of configurations and prices

Ravon R3 offers motorists a very modest choice of three trim levels: Comfort, Optimum and Elegant. Lada Granta is sold, unlike its opponent, in seven versions: Standart, Classic, Classic Optima, Comfort, Luxe and Luxe Prestige, as well as Club. An Uzbek sedan in the cheapest configuration can be bought for 670,000 rubles, while a domestic one can be purchased for about 440,000 rubles. Thus, the sedan from AvtoVAZ is noticeably cheaper than its Asian opponent. At the same time, it cannot be said that the Asian is much better equipped than the Russian. Their equipment is at approximately the same level. The same can be said for car reliability. Therefore, many car owners and experts consider the cost of the R3 to be unreasonably high.

Updated Lada Granta 2022

If we consider all the configurations of the Lada Granta 2022 in more detail, they have the following characteristics:

Standard - the presence of a partial-size spare wheel, a cabin filter, an immobilizer, a child lock, and a luggage compartment curtain.
Classic - equipment with wider capabilities, additional headrests and window lifts, on-board computer, steering wheel adjustment system.
Classic Optima - updated interior with air conditioning and heated side mirrors, a 106 hp power unit, which increases the cost of the car.
Comfort - price from 541.5 thousand rubles. increases depending on the availability of a power unit with a manual transmission, as well as an automatic transmission, the difference in the cost of the version with 87 and 98 hp engines. about 70 thousand rubles..
Club - modification of a car with an 87 hp engine. can be bought for 558.9 thousand rubles, and the engine is 98 hp. - for 628.9 thousand rubles, but the engine is 106 hp. with a manual transmission it costs 573.9 thousand rubles.
Luxe is a functional version of the configuration costing 579.8 thousand rubles. in minimal equipment, the maximum costs 619.8 thousand rubles, the presence of fog lights on the front bumper, 5 headrests, remote central locking, electrically heated mirrors, alarm system, climate and cruise control systems.
Luxe Prestige - availability of additional equipment in the form of light and rain sensors, parking sensors, manual transmission and 106 hp engine. provided in the flagship version of the new product, the automatic transmission increases the cost to 638.8 thousand rubles.

The presence of a manual gearbox increases the ground clearance to 16 cm, while a robotic gearbox reduces this characteristic to 14.5 cm.

Maintenance costs

The maintenance costs for these cars are approximately the same. Spare parts for them are inexpensive and available in many auto stores. And with good maintenance, machines can last for a very long time without serious breakdowns.

Configurations and prices of Lada Grants

#	Equipment	Model years	Cost, rub.	Drive unit	Transmission	Engine, cc. cm	Acceleration from 0 to 100, s	Max. speed, km/h	Power, max., hp (kW) at rpm	Fuel consumption in the combined cycle, l/100 km
1	1.6 MT Club	2019 —	572 900	Front	Manual transmission 5	1596	11.6	180	87 (64) / 5100	6,8
2	1.6MT Luxe	2019 —	594 800	Front	Manual transmission 5	1596	11.6	180	87 (64) / 5100	6,8
3	1.6MT Classic	2018 —	507 500	Front	Manual transmission 5	1596	11.6	180	87 (64) / 5100	6,8
4	1.6 MT Classic + Optima package	2018 —	533 500	Front	Manual transmission 5	1596	11.6	180	87 (64) / 5100	6,8
5	1.6MT Comfort	2018 —	555 500	Front	Manual transmission 5	1596	11.6	180	87 (64) / 5100	6,8
6	1.6MT Standard	2018 —	470 900	Front	Manual transmission 5	1596	11.6	170	87 (64) / 5100	6,8
7	1.6MT Luxe	2018 — 2019	553 800	Front	Manual transmission 5	1596	11.6	180	87 (64) / 5100	6,8
8	1.6 AT Club	2019 —	647 900	Front	Automatic 4	1596	13.1	165	98 (72) / 5600	7,2
9	1.6 AT Luxe	2019 —	669 800	Front	Automatic 4	1596	13.1	165	98 (72) / 5600	7,2
10	1.6 AT Comfort	2018 —	630 500	Front	Automatic 4	1596	13.1	165	98 (72) / 5600	7,2
11	1.6 AT Luxe	2018 — 2019	623 800	Front	Automatic 4	1596	13.1	165	98 (72) / 5600	7,2
12	1.6 MT Club	2019 —	587 900	Front	Manual transmission 5	1596	10.5	180	106 (78) / 5800	6,5
13	1.6MT Drive Active Comfort	2019 —	659 900	Front	Manual transmission 5	1596	10.5	162	106 (78) / 5800	6,5
14	1.6MT Luxe	2019 —	609 800	Front	Manual transmission 5	1596	10.5	180	106 (78) / 5800	6,5
15	1.6 MT Luxe + Prestige package	2019 —	628 800	Front	Manual transmission 5	1596	10.5	180	106 (78) / 5800	6,5
16	1.6MT Comfort	2018 —	570 500	Front	Manual transmission 5	1596	10.5	180	106 (78) / 5800	6,5
17	1.6MT Luxe	2018 — 2019	568 800	Front	Manual transmission 5	1596	10.5	180	106 (78) / 5800	6,5
18	1.6 MT Luxe + Prestige package	2018 — 2019	587 800	Front	Manual transmission 5	1596	10.5	180	106 (78) / 5800	6,5
19	1.6 AMT Drive Active Comfort	2019 —	684 900	Front	Manual transmission 5	1596	12	162	106 (78) / 5800	6,5
20	1.6 AMT Luxe	2019 —	634 800	Front	Manual transmission 5	1596	12	180	106 (78) / 5800	6,5
21	1.6 AMT Luxe + Prestige package	2019 —	653 800	Front	Manual transmission 5	1596	12	180	106 (78) / 5800	6,5
22	1.6 AMT Classic + Optima package	2018 —	573 500	Front	Manual transmission 5	1596	12	180	106 (78) / 5800	6,5
23	1.6 AMT Comfort	2018 —	595 500	Front	Manual transmission 5	1596	12	180	106 (78) / 5800	6,5
24	1.6 AMT Luxe	2018 — 2019	593 800	Front	Manual transmission 5	1596	12	180	106 (78) / 5800	6,5
25	1.6 AMT Luxe + Prestige package	2018 — 2019	612 800	Front	Manual transmission 5	1596	12	180	106 (78) / 5800	6,5

Options and prices R3

#	Equipment	Model years	Cost, rub.	Drive unit	Transmission	Engine, cc. cm	Acceleration from 0 to 100, s	Max. speed, km/h	Power, max., hp (kW) at rpm	Fuel consumption in the combined cycle, l/100 km
1	1.5MT Comfort	2019 —	730 500	Front	Manual transmission 5	1485	12.2	178	107 (79) / 5800	6,5
2	1.5MT Optimum	2019 —	759 500	Front	Manual transmission 5	1485	12.2	178	107 (79) / 5800	6,5
3	1.5MT Comfort	2016 — 2018	499 000	Front	Manual transmission 5	1485	12.2	178	107 (79) / 5800	6,5
4	1.5MT Elegant	2016 — 2018	559 000	Front	Manual transmission 5	1485	12.2	178	107 (79) / 5800	6,5
5	1.5MT Optimum	2016 — 2018	529 000	Front	Manual transmission 5	1485	12.2	178	107 (79) / 5800	6,5
6	1.5 AT Elegant	2019 —	815 500	Front	Automatic 6	1485	12.3	179	107 (79) / 5800	7,0
7	1.5 AT Optimum	2019 —	799 900	Front	Automatic 6	1485	12.3	179	107 (79) / 5800	7,0
8	1.5 AT Elegant	2016 — 2018	599 000	Front	Automatic 6	1485	12.3	179	107 (79) / 5800	7,0
9	1.5 AT Optimum	2016 — 2018	569 000	Front	Automatic 6	1485	12.3	179	107 (79) / 5800	7,0

* — information on prices is for reference only. Check with your local dealer for exact pricing.

What are the “gadgets”?

As a rule, drivers turn towards Nexia even when they learn about the installation of a cooler sensor in the car. In Grant, changes in the temperature of the cooling fluid can only be issued if there is an on-board computer. But such a unit is only available in the “Lux” versions.

Onboard ultimatum

But the issue of having an on-board vehicle in the Daewoo cabin is not even discussed - this device is available in any modification. Also, in all trim levels of Nexia, the “set” includes headrests

The pillow advantage

But Granta has an answer to this challenge. All cars, even the standard “Norma”, are equipped with driver airbags.

And in the Lada’s cabin there is a feeling of more space. This is achieved due to the height of the body, which is an order of magnitude greater than the dimensions of the Nexia body.

Hush, VAZ is coming!

And then Daewoo pulls out his trump card from his pocket: this car has good sound insulation. But the VAZ literally “collects” sounds and vibrations in the cabin and gives a concert to passengers.

Give me the bill

What do you get for the money? The cost of the Lada in the basic modification is from 280 thousand rubles. This amount assumes the following “stuffing”: a spare wheel, an option for automatic rear door locking, a driver’s airbag, a standard electronic anti-theft device, and front brake discs.

Nexia in standard configuration will cost approximately 260 thousand rubles. Among the interesting things in this “set” will be the option of remote opening of the trunk and gas tank, anti-theft devices in doorways, and tinted windows.

Appearance, dimensions

Ravon P3 and Lada Granta have similar sizes. But their appearance differs quite significantly. If the first car looks quite simple and modest, then the second, after restyling, acquired bright and memorable features that unite it with other modern models of the Russian manufacturer.

The first sedan has a fairly simple appearance from the front with prominent large elongated headlights and rather large fog lights installed in the front bumper. The radiator grille consists of medium-sized stripes and has virtually no finishing. The rival's radiator grille has chrome strips. There is also chrome on the front bumper in the form of X-shaped inserts. The car has fairly large headlights with halogen lamps.

From the side, the Ravon attracts attention with its large and voluminous wheel arches, as well as small stripes on the doors. Granta attracts attention by the presence, even in the most inexpensive versions, of turn signal repeaters installed in the side mirrors, as well as plastic moldings on the doors, which are painted in the color of the entire body.

In initial versions, cars are sold on stamped wheels. Casting is required only in expensive trim levels.

At the rear of the car from Central Asia, fairly large triangular-shaped lights are installed. The trunk lid is small and blends well with the voluminous rear bumper. The Russian car also has a relatively large rear bumper and lights. In addition, on the trunk lid there is a chrome-plated brand name, laid out in large Latin letters. There are also small stamped stripes on the trunk that are almost invisible.

By the way, the P3 is available only in a sedan body, while its opponent, in addition to the sedan, is available in station wagon, liftback and hatchback bodies. These cars differ from the sedan only in the shape of the rear part and the trunk lid.

Let's sum it up

Despite the price increase, the demand for this car has not decreased. This car is a serious competitor to Dastun On-Do and Renault Logan. The car has the following advantages:

Powerful and economical engine.
Trouble-free transmission.
Low cost of maintenance.

But it is also worth highlighting the main disadvantages of the “Uzbek”. These include relatively poor interior build quality, stiff suspension, outdated design, meager equipment levels and poor handling.

As we can see, the Ravon Nexia RZ sedan is not without its shortcomings. But competitors also have the same disadvantages. Should I buy this car for myself? This is a purely individual question. "Ravon Nexia RZ" is the choice for those who want a simple, trouble-free car for everyday use. You won't be able to stand out in a crowd with him. You shouldn’t count on a comfortable interior with a spacious trunk either. After all, this is a budget car.

Salon and trunk

The cars belong to the budget class, so you can’t expect expensive interior trim. But, despite the use of relatively cheap plastic and fabric, it is made of very high quality. The cars can also boast of good noise insulation, which, however, will not be enough for true music lovers. The interior in both cases is quite spacious. True, some car owners and experts claim that the rear in the Lada is somewhat cramped than in the Ravon.

The cars have a fairly large dashboard of a modern design, which does not go well with round air vents, the shape of which is considered outdated. All functions are controlled in both cases by buttons and keys that are conveniently accessible to the driver under the multimedia system. There is no multifunction steering wheel, but the steering wheel is pleasant to the touch and turns very easily.

The Uzbek sedan, even in inexpensive versions, is sold with a good multimedia system. It has a sufficient range of options and sounds pretty good. The Russians install multimedia only on cars with maximum configurations. Owners of cheap versions have to be content with a simple audio system. But in both cases, real music lovers will have to think about purchasing other “music” after purchasing a car.

The seats in both cars are quite comfortable and have good lateral support. They are covered with fabric in dark shades, the color of which is offered to customers to choose from. There are several seat adjustment positions. In both cases, the rear will be a little cramped for three passengers. At the same time, according to many owners, the Lada can comfortably accommodate only two people in the rear, and not three, as stated by the manufacturer.

The Russian sedan has a more spacious trunk. Its volume is 520 liters versus 400 liters for the rival Central Asian manufacturer. Therefore, Granta is perfect even for transporting large cargo. Although you can easily transport quite a lot of things to Ravon. And if you need to increase the space in the luggage compartment of these cars, you can easily fold down the rear sofa.

Briefly about the main thing

Summarizing the review of the Ravon P3, we can say with confidence that the car fully justifies itself. Considering the budget cost and reliability of the technical base, it is simply impossible to choose a worthy analogue for it.

The advantages are obvious:

An excellent, proven engine with good traction and absolutely trouble-free operation, according to reviews from car owners. Chain drive adds reliability.
Affordable price.
Spacious interior and trunk.

Competitors with automatic transmissions are much more expensive, but in the budget segment this is a big plus. The lack of design refinements is the norm for a car of this class.

Let's go through the disadvantages, the main ones:

The first main disadvantage is called noise insulation.
The second disadvantage is the thin paintwork.

Well, and of course, if you are used to seeing touch screens in a car with many electronic systems and options, as well as expensive finishes, then all this is not in the car.

Which is better to choose?

Each of the considered cars has its own advantages and disadvantages. Both cars are good in their own way. Therefore, the choice is a personal matter for each motorist. And it must be done thoughtfully and carefully.

Both cars can be excellent assistants for every day. They are good for both everyday life and work. Sedans are quite reliable and unpretentious. There are also minimal comfort and safety options, which are quite sufficient for average drivers. True, the cost of Ravon, as experts and motorists think, is unreasonably high. After all, in terms of quality, an Uzbek is not at all ahead of a Russian. And it differs from the latter only in the presence, even in minimal versions, of good multimedia and some other unimportant options. In addition, there are many questions about the quality of the metal of this car. Since the car is a direct descendant of the famous Daewoo Nexia, which is known for its thin bodywork and susceptibility to corrosion, many people fear that the R3 will rot just as quickly. The Granta body remains strong for a very long time. In addition, the Russians, unlike their rivals, offer a much larger selection of trim levels, as well as additional equipment.

The cars are designed mainly for middle-aged motorists with a limited budget. But Russian cars can also attract the attention of young people. In addition, AvtoVAZ, in addition to the sedan, has cars in other body types that may be of interest to car enthusiasts with other needs.

The cars are perfect for regular trips around the city and outside the city. But on long journeys they will not be very comfortable. Uzbek and Russian can be used as a taxi or for frequent transportation of large cargo.

Despite the fact that such cars are more often purchased by men, women drivers are also found behind the wheel of such sedans, especially since there are versions with automatic transmission (robot).

If you want to buy an inexpensive and reliable car, you can easily opt for the creations of a Russian or Uzbek manufacturer. And you should choose only based on your own impressions and needs.

Behind the wheel

Driving the car is quite convenient. The automatic shifts are fast and logical. Handling is quite adequate for a car of this class. When driving at high speed, there is sometimes a lack of feedback.

Experts say...

There is some more food for thought. Journalists from a popular auto magazine conducted a special test drive to compare the models and answer the question: Granta or Nexia - which is better? The test took place in winter, which in a certain way left its mark on the results of the race. Here are some interesting conclusions drawn by experts.

Test drive a Daewoo Nexia:

The doors of Nexia freeze in the cold and are difficult to close.
On Grant the thermostat slows down and the fan freezes. If you don't take action, it's chilly in the cabin.
The Granta's interior is the most ergonomic and comfortable of all VAZ models. There are comfortable chairs, decent decoration, air conditioning and music. Beautiful and clear panel.
Nexia loses in interior design. Ergonomics is also not a plus: “wobbly” seats, the steering wheel is too low, it’s cramped... The heating system works mediocrely and does not distribute warm air flows evenly.
In terms of driving performance, Grants have the advantage. The steering wheel hangs a little on small turns, but otherwise the Lada is very good. It runs smoothly, but if necessary, shows character and quickly picks up speed, which is surprising, but true, given the standard capabilities of the engine. Decent suspensions are installed - passengers do not jump in the pits.